![]() |
Master of Arts in Chinese Studies Program
Valparaiso University |
MACS Program News
Summer Immersion Program
Housing for MACS Students
Check out this website for listings of unfurnished or furnished apartments, town homes, duplexes, rooms for rent: www.valpo.edu/law/admit/housing.php.Financial Aid and Student Accounts
Fall 2006 Course Schedule for MACS
For All Accepted MACS Students
a) Fall Semester begins August 22, 2006. In order to begin the registration process, be sure to email Professor Zhimin Lin (Advisor, Zhimin.Lin@valpo.edu) as soon as possible.How much will MACS improve your Chinese language proficiency?
MACS is aimed at raising the level of Chinese proficiency of its graduates from Level 2 as defined by Interagency Language Roundtable to Level 3 by the time they graduate. The following chart compares the differences between Level 2 and Level 3 in language proficiency (part I, part II will be published in June newsletter).
Speaking:
Level 2: Able to satisfy routine social demands and limited work
requirements. Can handle routine work-related interactions that are limited in
scope. In more complex and sophisticated work-related tasks, language usage
generally disturbs the native speaker. Can handle with confidence, but not with
facility, most normal, high-frequency conversational situations including
extensive, but casual conversations about current events, as well as work,
family, and autobiographical information. The individual can get the gist of
most everyday conversations but has some difficulty social understanding
native speakers in situations that require specialized or sophisticated
knowledge. The individual's utterances are minimally cohesive. Linguistic
structure is usually not very elaborate and not thoroughly controlled; errors
are frequent. Vocabulary use is appropriate for high-frequency utterances, but
unusual or imprecise elsewhere.
Level 3: Able to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and informal conversations in practical, social and professional topics. Nevertheless, the individual's limitations generally restrict the professional contexts of language use to matters of shared knowledge and/or international convention. Discourse is cohesive. The individual uses the language acceptably, but with some noticeable imperfections; yet, errors virtually never interfere with understanding and rarely disturb the native speaker. The individual can effectively combine structure and vocabulary to convey his/her meaning accurately. The individual speaks readily and fills pauses suitably. In face-to-face conversation with natives speaking the standard dialect at a normal rate of speech, comprehension is quite complete. Although cultural references, proverbs and the implications of nuances and idiom may not be fully understood, the individual can easily repair the conversation. Pronunciation may be obviously foreign. Individual sounds are accurate: but stress, intonation and pitch control may be faulty.
Listening:
Level 2: Sufficient comprehension to understand conversations on routine
socialdemands and limited job requirements. Able to understand face-to-face
speech ina standard dialect, delivered at a normal rate with some repetition
and rewording, by a native speaker not used to dealing with foreigners, about
everyday topics, common personal and family news, well-known current events
and routine office matters through descriptions and narration about current,
past and future events; can follow essential points of discussion or speech at
an elementary level on topics in his/her special professional field. Only
understands occasional words and phrases of statements made in unfavorable
conditions, for example through loudspeakers outdoors. Understands factual
content. Native language causes less interference in listening comprehension.
Able to understand facts; i.e., the lines but not between or beyond the lines.
Level 3: Able to understand the essentials of all speech in a standard dialect including technical discussions within a special field. Has effective understanding of face-to-face speech, delivered with normal clarity and speed in a standard dialect on general topics and areas of special interest; understands hypothesizing and supported opinions. Has broad enough vocabulary that rarely has to ask for paraphrasing or explanation. Can follow accurately the essentials of conversations between educated native speakers, reasonably clear telephone calls, radio broadcasts, news stories similar to wire service reports, oral reports, some oral technical reports and public addresses on non-technical subjects; can understand without difficulty all forms of standard speech concerning a special professional field. Does not understand native speakers it they speak very quickly or use some slang or dialect. Can often detect emotional overtones. Can understand implications.
Reading:
Level 2: Sufficient comprehension to read simple, authentic written
material in a form equivalent to usual printing or typescript on subjects
within a familiar context. Able to read with some misunderstandings
straightforward, familiar, factual material, but in general insufficiently
experienced with the language to draw inferences directly from the linguistic
aspects of the text. Can locate and understand the main ideas and details in
material written for the general reader. However, persons who have professional
knowledge of a subject may be able to summarize or perform sorting and locating
tasks with written texts that are well beyond their general proficiency level.
The individual can read uncomplicated, but authentic prose on familiar subjects
that are normally presented in a predictable sequence which aids the reader in
understanding. Texts may include descriptions and narrations in contexts such
as news items describing frequently occurring events, simple biographical
information, social notices, formulaic business letters, and simple technical
material written for the general reader. Generally the prose that can be read
by the individual is predominantly in straightforward/high-frequency sentence
patterns. The individual does not have a broad active vocabulary (that is,
which he/she recognizes immediately on sight), but is able to use contextual
and real-world cues to understand the text. Characteristically, however, the
individual is quite slow in performing such a process. Is typically able to
answer factual questions about authentic texts of the types described above.
Level 3: Able to read within a normal range of speed and with almost
complete comprehension a variety of authentic prose material on unfamiliar
subjects. Reading ability is not dependent on subject matter knowledge,
although it is not expected that the individual can comprehend thoroughly
subject matter which is highly dependent on cultural knowledge or which is
outside his/her general experience and not accompanied by explanation.
Text-types include news stories similar to wire service reports or
international news items in major periodicals, routine correspondence, general
reports, and technical material in his/her professional field; all of these
may include hypothesis, argumentation and supported opinions. Misreading rare.
Almost always able to interpret material correctly, relate ideas and "read
between the lines," (that is, understand the writers' implicit intents in text
of the above types). Can get the gist of more sophisticated texts, but may be
unable to detect or understand subtlety and nuance. Rarely has to pause over
or reread general vocabulary. However, may experience some difficulty with
unusually complex structure and low frequency idioms.
For more information regarding the MACS program, contact Jamie Haney, Program Coordinator, at 800-821-7685 or email Jamie.Haney@valpo.edu; Professor Zhimin Lin at Zhimin.Lin@valpo.edu; or the Graduate Studies Office at graduate.studies@valpo.edu or www.valpo.edu/gce/macs.
* This newsletter is prepared by the MACS program. We welcome your comments and/or suggestions.