World Human Geography Home

GEO 101 World Human Geography
Discussions Fall 2007
Discussion 8: The Geography of Commercial Agriculture

Reading To Be Done before This Discussion:

: Klooster, Daniel J. 2005. Producing social nature in the Mexican countryside. Cultural Geograhies 12"321-344.

Things to Bring to Class: Your own notes on the article and/or a print out.

Due in Discussion This Week: Answers to the questions below.

Due in Discussion Next Week: Essay 2 and Questions as usual

Concepts/Ideas/Places: translocality, globalization, mobility, production of nature, production of culture, political economy, urbanization, commercial agriculture, agricultural industrialization, energy, labor, social reproduction, interconnection, environment. Mexico

Essay 2 Assignment: For your second essay you need to read the article and think about the arguments that the author makes about why people continue to live in rural Mexico despite the decline in the agricultural economy. Then you need to write a five paragraph essay that answers the following question:

Klooster (2005:340) writes that "Although the details vary considerably from place to place, the world is full of people like the rural Mexicans who stay put, people who stubbornly enact lives different from the ones suggested by the economic relationships of global capitalism, people who maintain identities more complex than those of peasant, proletarian, or capitalist entrepreneur."

Why do people in rural Mexico "stay put" and what enables them to do so despite the decline of the agricultural economy due to changing "economic relationships of global capitalism"?

Unlike your first essay, here you are not arguing whether or not the author is correct. This essay is more about explanation and displaying your understanding of ideas in the article than it is about arguing a particular position. Nevertheless the idea is the same. This time your thesis statement will directly answer the question by identifying three different ways that the article explains the failure of people to act according to economic explanations. Why do people continue to maintain rural livelihoods when most economic opportunities are located elsewhere? How do they manage to make a living despite living in places where they lack sufficient means to make a living? What does Klooster mean in the statement presented above?

As always your essay must be typed (or word-processed), double spaced, in 12 pt font, stapled, and with 1 inch margins all around. You must cite any direct quotes AND paraphrased ideas from the article or other sources as directed in Citing Sources in GEO 101. Papers that do not properly cite sources will lose points. For more information on the 5 paragraph essay format and what makes a good essay see the Syllabus and "Writing an 'A' Essay" Finally you should write more than one draft of your paper. Do not hand in your first draft. Read your paper over and evaluate it using the Grading Guide for Short Essays. Make sure that you've fixed any typos and grammar problems. Then make sure that your paper makes sense and that you have supported your argument well. Fix the paper where needed and hand in your second or third draft. If you have trouble with any aspect of the paper do not hesitate to get help from your professor or from the Writing Center.


To Prepare for Discussion: In perhaps no other case does the interaction between market forces, social relationships, and the natural environment become as clear as it does in the structure of modern industrial agriculture. Agriculture is perhaps the most important of the ways in which humans relate to their environment and its study has traditionally been of great concern to geographers. The past two centuries have been a period of remarkable change in human agricultural practices including the introduction of mechanized farming, the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, improved high yielding crops, and most recently the introduction of genetically modified crops. Today we produce more food per unit of land than at any time in history. This has enabled humans to produce more than enough food to feed our growing population. The benefits of these technological changes are immeasurable. Yet this productivity also has economic, environmental, and cultural costs.

The article you will read for this week's discussion is exceptional in the way that it helps to connect much of what we have talked about so far this semester. As you read, pay attention to how it synthesizes issues related to demographic change, migration, economic globalization, nature, culture, identity, and of course agriculture. This kind of synthesis is at the heart of what geography is all about. The article provides a multi-dimensional explanation of the continued occupance of rural regions in Mexico. Where an economist might understand continuing to live in rural areas despite the collapse of the economy as irrational behavior, the geographer pays attention to how the economy interacts with culture and nature at different geographical scales.
The decline of agriculture in rural Mexico is of course a product of the emergence of a global food production system where food is produced in the places that have the greatest comparative advantage. In rural Mexico this means that instead of producing maize for local consumption, it is purchased from the United States. In order to maintain livelihoods income has to be generated from other activities including pottery and crafts. However, the most significant source of income is remittances from family members working abroad. Most often when we think about globalization we think in terms of goods and services flowing freely across the globe. Rarely do we talk about globalization in terms of a free flow of labor. Regional economic changes associated with globalization create push and pull factors that encourage migration. What is surprising in this article is the extent to which people adapt to globalization through temporary migration while maintaining their commitment to place and community.

Additional Questions to Be Discussed

  • What implications does this article have for current debates about illegal immigration?
  • What does the author mean when he talks about "producing culture while producing nature"?
  • What is social nature and what does the author mean by the production of culture?
  • How does this treatment of the relation between culture and nature offer an alternative to environmental determinism?


Name:
Honor Code:

Questions (to be completed before discussion)

1. What enables people to continue to live in rural Mexico despite the poor agricultural economy?

 

 

2. What are two factors that led to the decline of agriculture in rural Mexico?

 

 

3. Why does the author argue that continuing to live in countryside is a form of cultural resistance? What are the rural residents resisting?

 

 


4. Why are considerations of scale important when explaining people's abilities to maintain households in rural areas?

 

 


5. What is one question about agriculture and rural livelihoods that you would like to discuss in class?