|
GEO
101 World Human Geography |
||
|
Reading To Be Done before This Discussion: : Klooster, Daniel J. 2005. Producing social nature in the Mexican countryside. Cultural Geograhies 12"321-344. Things to Bring to Class: Your own notes on the article and/or a print out. Due in Discussion This Week: Answers to the questions below. Due in Discussion Next Week: Essay 2 and Questions as usual Concepts/Ideas/Places: translocality, globalization, mobility, production of nature, production of culture, political economy, urbanization, commercial agriculture, agricultural industrialization, energy, labor, social reproduction, interconnection, environment. Mexico Essay 2 Assignment: For your second essay you need to read the article and think about the arguments that the author makes about why people continue to live in rural Mexico despite the decline in the agricultural economy. Then you need to write a five paragraph essay that answers the following question: Klooster (2005:340) writes that "Although the details vary considerably from place to place, the world is full of people like the rural Mexicans who stay put, people who stubbornly enact lives different from the ones suggested by the economic relationships of global capitalism, people who maintain identities more complex than those of peasant, proletarian, or capitalist entrepreneur." Why do people in rural Mexico "stay put" and what enables them to do so despite the decline of the agricultural economy due to changing "economic relationships of global capitalism"? Unlike your first essay, here you are not arguing whether or not the author is correct. This essay is more about explanation and displaying your understanding of ideas in the article than it is about arguing a particular position. Nevertheless the idea is the same. This time your thesis statement will directly answer the question by identifying three different ways that the article explains the failure of people to act according to economic explanations. Why do people continue to maintain rural livelihoods when most economic opportunities are located elsewhere? How do they manage to make a living despite living in places where they lack sufficient means to make a living? What does Klooster mean in the statement presented above? As always your essay must be typed (or word-processed), double spaced, in 12 pt font, stapled, and with 1 inch margins all around. You must cite any direct quotes AND paraphrased ideas from the article or other sources as directed in Citing Sources in GEO 101. Papers that do not properly cite sources will lose points. For more information on the 5 paragraph essay format and what makes a good essay see the Syllabus and "Writing an 'A' Essay" Finally you should write more than one draft of your paper. Do not hand in your first draft. Read your paper over and evaluate it using the Grading Guide for Short Essays. Make sure that you've fixed any typos and grammar problems. Then make sure that your paper makes sense and that you have supported your argument well. Fix the paper where needed and hand in your second or third draft. If you have trouble with any aspect of the paper do not hesitate to get help from your professor or from the Writing Center.
The article you will read for this week's discussion is exceptional
in the way that it helps to connect much of what we have talked about
so far this semester. As you read, pay attention to how it synthesizes
issues related to demographic change, migration, economic globalization,
nature, culture, identity, and of course agriculture. This kind of synthesis
is at the heart of what geography is all about. The article provides
a multi-dimensional explanation of the continued occupance of rural
regions in Mexico. Where an economist might understand continuing to
live in rural areas despite the collapse of the economy as irrational
behavior, the geographer pays attention to how the economy interacts
with culture and nature at different geographical scales. Additional Questions to Be Discussed
Questions (to be completed before discussion) 1. What enables people to continue to live in rural Mexico despite the poor agricultural economy?
2. What are two factors that led to the decline of agriculture in rural Mexico?
3. Why does the author argue that continuing to live in countryside is a form of cultural resistance? What are the rural residents resisting?
|
||
|
Home | Previous Discussion | Discussion Manual Contents | Next Discussion |
||