|
Reading to be done before Class:
AE Articles 7 "High-Tech Trash", 25 "Landfill-on-Sea" CES Chapter 14, Additional
Article provided in class
Come to class with a basic familiarity with
the following concepts and ideas: Hazardous Waste, recycling,
minimizing, Woburn, Mass case study, cluster, epidemiology, superfund,
National Priority List, minamata Bay, Love Canal.
Additional Assignment:
Hazardous waste
recycling argument due
Today we start off with a discussion of recycling. This is probably
what most of you think of when you think of helping to conserve
environmental resources. Often it seems as if environmental activism
gets reduced to recycling. This is because it is a simple thing
that you as an individual can do to help the environment. However,
it is awfully difficult to recycle if one lacks the means to do
so. While the City
of Valparaiso recycles much of its waste (diverting 45% of waste
from the landfill) other cities have not done as well. Chicago's
"blue bag" recycling program is currently under fire.
Residents purchase blue bags, put recyclables in them, and then
place them on the curb. The bags are included with the other trash
and then the recyclables are picked out at sorting facilities. Furthermore
not all of the trash goes to facilities that sort the recyclables
out and allegations of political corruption abound. These
revelations
may serve to discourage participation in recycling in Chicago even
if a better program is put in place.
Some claim that we really do not need to recycle because there
is really plenty of landfill space. While this may be true in some
places, a particular concern for those communities surrounding big
cities like Chicago is the possibility that trash from a
neighboring
big city may be imported to their towns. As you may know, just such
a controversy over a landfill
site in Porter County was fought a few years ago. While the
developers suggested
that they would limit the landfill to local trash, they conceded
that they would import trash from out of state if local trash weren't
profitable enough. 2000 people turned out to protest the landfill
in part because Native American burial mounds are located on the
proposed site.*
Disposing of waste can be approached as technical and scientific
problems. After all, science and engineering can help us find way
of re-using our waste products. Many of the gains in efficiency
in both the use of materials and energy are the product of technical
advances. What is also clear from the readings this week and throughout
the course is that managing waste is also a social, political, and
economic problem. While recycling is a way that you can contribute
to "saving the planet" much more needs to happen before
recycling is widespread, economically feasible, and politically
popular. Helping the environment then has to involve more than just
individual action. As the case studies we read this week show, collective
political organizing and community activism is responsible for building
political support for many of the environmental laws and amenities
that we enjoy today. The next time you recycle a pop can, think
about not just the good that you are doing by recycling, but also
about everything that had to happen to put that recycling bin there
for you to use.
In addition to discussing the results of your homework assignment
we will discuss the two articles you have read for today. One
emerging issue is the disposal of electronic waste. With rapid
technological change comes the need to deal with tons of obsolete
electronics. Much of this e-waste is exported to other
countries that have lower environmental standards than we do.
Are there better solutions to the problem of e-waste? Finally
we take a second look at the Pacific Garbage patch. Of
particular interest here is the notion that your actions here and
now can have consequences very far away and into the future.
Questions we will discuss:
1. What are the rules and facilities for recycling where you come
from? Why are recycling systems different? Do some sound better
than others?
2. What toxic waste products do you have in your home? What is
the best way to dispose of them?
3. Why are controversies over where to put landfills so contentious?
Where is the best place to dispose of solid waste? If NIMBY where?
4. What should Chicago do to improve its recycling program?
5. What should Valparaiso do to improve its recycling program?
6. What should VU do to improve its recycling program?
7. How can we better dispose of or recycle our e-waste?
What are the best solutions?
8. Both articles on e-waste and the Pacific garbage patch
emphasize the fact that dealing with waste is not just a local issue.
How can we deal with our solid waste locally? What options are
available to us?
*A claim supported by Professor Ron Janke of Valparaiso University
and Mark Schurr of the University of notre Dame and accepted by
the state archeology office. The claim was contested by the company
that wanted to build the landfill.
|